PHI 105 Week 5 Assignment

PHI
105 Week 5 Assignment Help  1 | Grand Canyon University 

Assignment

Details:

Use
the outline you created in week 4 to write the first draft of your
essay.

Review
the Persuasive Essay Guidelines.

Review
the Persuasive Essay First Draft Rubric to help guide you.

Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style
Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You
are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center.

PHI-105
Persuasive Essay Guidelines

Modules
1-7: Full-Course Assignment

·        
Throughout this course, you will work on writing a persuasive essay
of 750­–1,000 words (roughly 3–5 pages).

·        
The essay-writing process is broken down into seven parts. Each part
will be due in a different module and graded separately.

1.    
Topic and Audience (due by the end of Module 1)

2.    
Brainstorm (due by the end of Module 2)

3.    
Thesis Statement (due by the end of Module 3)

4.    
Outline (due by the end of Module 4)

5.    
First Draft (due by the end of Module 5)

6.    
Peer Review (due by the end of Module 6)

7.    
Final Draft (due by the end of Module 7)

·        
Your essay will be informed by the module readings and the use of
three to five resources, that you will need to locate using the GCU
eLibrary.

·        
For this essay, you will begin by choosing a topic from the list
provided in the “Persuasive Essay: Topic and Audience
Worksheet”. If you would like to write about a topic that is not on
the list, you may ask the instructor for permission.

·        
Next, take a position on your topic by deciding if you
arefororagainstthe topic oragreeordisagreewith specific issues
related to the topic. This would be considered the “writing
prompt”,or what you will be responding to in your essay.

·        
The goal of this essay is for you to persuade your audience to agree
with your position. Your written essay should demonstrate critical
thinking by adhering to the following principles which will be
studied throughout the course:

1.    
Manage emotions and avoid fallacies.

2.    
Provide evidence to support your position.

3.    
Acknowledge other perspectives and evaluate assumptions about the
topic.

4.    
Use facts and figures when appropriate.

·        
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

·        
This assignment uses a grading rubric that can be viewed at the
assignment’s drop box. Instructors will be using the rubric
to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.

·        
The first draft and final essaymust be submitted toTurnitin.Refer to
the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can
be submitted to Turnitin

Topic5
Rubric: Persuasive Essay:First Draft

Criteria %
Value
1:
Unsatisfactory
2:
Less Than Satisfactory
3:
Satisfactory
4:
Good
5:
Excellent
%
Scaling
  0% 65% 75% 85% 100%
Content
– 80%
Personal
Perspective and Position

 
 
25% Addresses
a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify
presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately
identifies one’s own position on the topic.  Vague
explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific
issues related to the topic is made.Position completely appeals to
emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately
identifies one’s own position on the topic. Explains the
position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific
issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to
emotion instead of reason.
Formulates
a clear and precise personal point of view of the topic. Clearly
explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to
specific issues related to the topic is made.Position appeals
mostly to reason.
Formulates
a clear and precise personal point of view of the topic.
Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues
related to the topic are fully presented in great detail.Position
appeals to reason. 
Argues
to persuade

 
30% No
real persuasive argument is made. No outside sources are used.
Presents
a vague argument relative to the topic and presents no evidence to
support the argument.Fewer than three outside sources are used.
Presents
an argument relative to the topic and presents minimal evidence to
support the argument.Not all evidence is relevant to the argument.
At least three outside sources are used.
Presents
an argument relative to the topic and presents keyevidence to
support the argument. At least three outside sources are used.
Presents
an argument relative to the topic and presents key evidence to
support the argument.Identifies not only the main issues, but also
the embedded, implicit, or unspoken aspects of the topic. At least
three outside sources are used.
Adheres
to principles of critical thinking

Manage
emotions and avoid fallacies.
Provide
evidence to support your position.
Acknowledge
other perspectives and evaluate assumptions about the topic.
Use
facts and figures when appropriate.
25% Fails
to adhere to almost all principles of critical thinking.
Adheres
to few principles of critical thinking.
Adheres
to some principles of critical thinking on a surface level.
Adheres
to many principles of critical thinking. Use of the principles is
clear to see.
Adheres
to most of the principles of critical thinking. Attempts to
incorporate each one in a logical and fluid way.
Organization
and Effectiveness – 15%
Thesis
Developmentand Purpose

 
 
7% Paper
lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
 
Thesis
and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague;
purpose is not clear. 
Thesis
and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis
and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the
paper.  It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis
and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis
is the essence of the paper.  Thesis statement makes the
purpose of the paper clear.
Paragraph
Development and Transitions

 
4% Paragraphs
and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence.  No
apparent connections between paragraphs are established.
Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. 
Organization is disjointed. 
Some
paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas,
unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.  Some degree of
organization is evident.
Paragraphs
are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A
logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. 
Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. 
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
There
is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. 
Ideas progress and relate to each other.  Paragraph and
transition construction guide the reader.  Paragraph
structure is seamless. 
 
Mechanics
of Writing 
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

 
4% Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of
meaning.Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are
used.
Frequent
and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure,
and/or word choice are present.
Some
mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose
is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of
speech are used.
Writer
is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
 
Format
– 5%
Paper
Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
2% GCU
template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
GCU
template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack
of control with formatting is apparent.
 
GCU
template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor
errors may be present.
GCU
template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
All
format elements are correct.
 
Research
Citations
(In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct
quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate
to assignment and style)
3% No
reference page is included. No citations are used.
           
Reference
page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference
page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be

The post PHI 105 Week 5 Assignment appeared first on My Assignment Online.