essay 4 pages total of 5 paragraph. analyzing the article (l

essay 4 pages total of 5 paragraph. analyzing the article (link attached below): The Upside of Income Inequality by Gary Becker and Kevin M. Murphy (link is below). Include 3 outside sources plus the selected, main article so a total of 4 sources in 5 pages (including the works cited page) (no outdated sources). Everything in MLA format. evidence should consist mainly of quotations from the selected essay, and your analysis and evaluation of those quotations. Concentrate on analyzing the appeals, evidence, logic & other general rhetorical features (like the tone, humor & ease of understanding) of the essay.Your thesis should probably be that the essay is 1) effective, 2) ineffective, or 3) partially effective in convincing you that the author’s world view is correct. You should follow this with a plan of development, laying out your arguments.Your job is NOT to agree or disagree with the essay per see. Your job is to determine if the essay is “well argued.” There are a number of things to look at that we will be covering in class. Use your sources to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the argument you are analyzing, not the arguments themselves. So…not “The original essay says X is wrong, but this es say says it’s right,” but “The original essay had few facts supporting its case, but this essay, by so-and-so, uses dozens of facts in the first two pages to build an argument that is very difficult to dispute.”1- Compare to other essays on the same topic by others. Sometimes you can find articles that respond directly to yours, other times you will have to find pieces which are simply on the same topic.Who is more logical? Who uses more or better evidence? Who is more fair? Who is more qualified?2- Look, in depth, at the appeals (rational/emotional/ethical) that the author uses to make their arguments. Are they fair, honest, persuasive?3- Look at the logic used in the essay. Does the author use any logical fallacies? How do you know it’s a fallacy?•Look at the evidence the author uses. Does it come from reputable sources? Is it current? Does It say what they say it says?Is it plentiful enough?4- Does the author anticipate opposition? When they bring up objections that they will argue against, are they “real” objections (that an actual human would make?) or are they “strawmen”—designed to make their opponents look foolish, and not meaningfully critical or realistic?5- Does the author make any unfair arguments: attacks on his opponent’s personal lives, name calling, slander, etc?Thank you in advance,

Posted in Uncategorized